Rebuttal From Drs Bishop and Eberl

Editorial and Rebuttal from Authors

As more and more men undergo radical prostatectomy as their primary treatment for prostate cancer, it is becoming evident that not all of them will enjoy a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-free status for the rest of their life. As presented in other series with long-term follow-up, the risk for biochemical recurrence continued to increase over time in a large European series from Hamburg [1]. T...

Rebuttal from Millet, Faiss, and Pialoux.

Read more and get great! That's what the book enPDFd rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux will give for every reader to read this book. This is an on-line book provided in this website. Even this book becomes a choice of someone to read, many in the world also loves it so much. As what we talk, when you read more every page of this rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux, what you will obtain ...

Rebuttal from Daniel Beard and Eric Feigl.

Dr. Andrew’s proposal (Andrew, 2013) to rename Guyton’s venous return curve the ‘venous pressure curve’ seems unlikely to overcome the decades of misinterpretation and confusion that the Guytonmodel of the systemic circulation has engendered. In Guyton’s experiments venous return curves were produced with a pump connected from the right atrium to the pulmonary artery in an anaesthetized, open c...

Rebuttal from David Simpson and Jurgen Claassen

We have read the point of view presented elegantly by Tzeng and Panerai (2018) with interest. We have to admit there is little hard evidence on which we can base our preference for enhanced blood pressure variability. The arguments against, however, are also not very strong. The argument is perhaps more strongly based on basic principles than solid evidence. We fully agree with Tzeng and Panera...

Response to comments from Drs. Alter and Rosenberg.